> On Dec 4, 2014, at 10:17 AM, George, Wes <wesley.geo...@twcable.com> wrote: > WG] Has there been any actual discussion about how much "nobody" would > have to pay for ARIN (or another party) to fix the balance of liability > and provide a proper SLA that led to "no, I don't want to pay for that" > responses from those who are expressing the concern, or is this just > conjecture on your part?
I’ve asked a lot of people, “Would you be willing to pay ARIN for RPKI
services,” and the answer has always been “no.” Until I get a “yes,” it’s hard
to put a number (other than zero) on how the market values RPKI. So, asking
how much more risk ARIN is willing to take on seems a little premature.
> The problem with free services is that often you get what you pay for when
> it comes to support, warranty, etc.
Yep.
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
