Am I correct in thinking that the SIDR work going on in the IETF takes the registries out of the real-time processing of route authentication/attestation?
Is RPKI a stop-gap while we wait for full path validation? Should we be focusing our energies in that area? On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Sandra Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Dec 4, 2014, at 12:39 PM, John Curran <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Dec 4, 2014, at 11:35 AM, Christopher Morrow <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > Note that the claims that could ensue from an operator failing to follow > best practices > > and then third-parties suffering an major operational outage is likely > to be large > > > > > > Undertaking that risk to the other services that everyone else presently > rely upon > > (Whois, reverse DNS) is not reasonable > > Which begs the question for me -- ARIN already operates services that > operators rely upon. Why are they different? Does ARIN run no risk of > litigation due to some perceived involvement of those services in someone's > operational outage? > > Has there been litigation against ARIN tied to, for example, reverse DNS? > Or the IRR? > > --Sandy > >
