My mistake, it's the OCX1100. http://www.networkworld.com/article/2855056/sdn/juniper-unbundles-switch-hardware-software.html
2015-01-13 20:10 GMT-02:00 Jeff Tantsura <[email protected]>: > What does it mean - to be SDN ready? > > Cheers, > Jeff > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Eduardo Schoedler <[email protected]> > Date: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 at 3:25 AM > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Recommended L2 switches for a new IXP > > >QFX5100 is SDN ready. > > > >-- > >Eduardo Schoedler > > > > > >2015-01-13 6:29 GMT-02:00 Stepan Kucherenko <[email protected]>: > > > >> Is there any particular reason you prefer EX4600 over QFX5100 ? Not > >> counting obvious differences like ports and upgrade options. > >> > >> It's the same chipset after all, and with all upgrades they have the > >> same 10G density (with breakouts). Is that because you can have more 40G > >> ports with EX4600 ? > >> > >> I'm still trying to find out if there are any noticeable software or > >> feature differences. > >> > >> On 13.01.2015 09:01, Mark Tinka wrote: > >> > On Monday, January 12, 2015 11:41:20 PM Tony Wicks wrote: > >> > > >> >> People seem to be avoiding recommending actual devices, > >> >> well I would recommend the Juniper EX4600 - > >> >> > >> >> http://www.juniper.net/us/en/products-services/switching/ > >> >> ex-series/ex4600/ > >> >> > >> >> They are affordable, highly scalable, stackable and run > >> >> JunOS. > >> > > >> > We've been quite happy with the EX4550, but the EX4600 is > >> > good too, particularly if you're coming from its younger > >> > brother. > >> > > >> > Mark. > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >-- > >Eduardo Schoedler > > -- Eduardo Schoedler
