The BeagleBone's ethernet is directly connected to the SoC, so you would get a higher throughput ceiling than the rpi.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015, 19:03 Geoff Mulligan <[email protected]> wrote: > I have used the BeagleBone to run a few simple servers. I don't know if > the ethernet port on the Bone is on the USB bus. It is slightly more > expensive than a PI, but they have worked well for me. > > Geoff > > On 02/18/2015 04:44 PM, Peter Loron wrote: > > For any site where you would use a Pi as the DNS cache, it won't be an > > issue. DNS isn't that heavy at those query rates. > > > > Yeah, it would be awesome if they'd been able to get a SoC that > > included ethernet. > > > > -Pete > > > > On 2015-02-18 15:08, Robert Webb wrote: > >> What I do not like about the Pi is the network port is on the USB bus > >> and thus limited to USB speeds. > >> > >> <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Maxwell Cole > >> <[email protected]> </div><div>Date:02/18/2015 4:30 PM > >> (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: "[email protected] >> 'NANOG list'" > >> <[email protected]> </div><div>Subject: Re: OT - Small DNS "appliances" > >> for remote offices. </div><div> > >> </div> > >
