-.-- --- ..- / -.- -. --- .-- / .-- .... .- - / .-- --- ..- .-.. -.. / -- .- -.- . / - .... .. ... / .-- .... --- .-.. . / -.-. --- -. ...- . .-. ... .- - .. --- -. / -... . - - . .-. ..--.. / .. ..-. / .. - / .-- . .-. . / .. -. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . .-.-.-
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Michael Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > On 02/27/2015 10:02 AM, Naslund, Steve wrote: >> >> I am talking about real compelling content with value not an HD camera >> staring at a wall. Even backups are rarely an issue for the average user as >> long as their backup solution is intelligent enough to use bandwidth >> efficiently. Really, the average user's circuit is sitting idle most of the >> time in any case so if that backup takes all day to complete, no one cares. >> On this group we have to watch that we do not see ourselves as the "average >> user", we definitely are not. >> > > As with everything I want it when I want it. It has nothing to do with > aggregate bytes, but burst. If I'm uploading 4k content > of baby's first birthday for all of the grandparents, they are not happy if > the intertoobs busts a gasket. > > Mike
