To the best of my knowledge, yes. Owen
> On Feb 27, 2015, at 15:08 , Michael Hallgren <m.hallg...@free.fr> wrote: > > Le 27/02/2015 23:19, Owen DeLong a écrit : >> Any website which does not violate the law. >> >> In other words, if a lawful takedown order > > So, subject to legal control rather than simply administrative. Right? > > mh > >> has been applied to a website, this code can’t be used to force an ISP to >> provide illegal access to said site. >> >> Owen >> >>> On Feb 27, 2015, at 11:14 , Jim Richardson <weaselkee...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> From 47CFR§8.5b >>> (b) A person engaged in the provision of mobile broadband Internet >>> access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not block >>> consumers from accessing lawful Web sites, subject to reasonable >>> network management; nor shall such person block applications that >>> compete with the provider's voice or video telephony services, subject >>> to reasonable network management. >>> >>> What's a "lawful" web site? >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Lamar Owen <lo...@pari.edu> wrote: >>>> On 02/27/2015 01:19 PM, Rob McEwen wrote: >>>>> We're solving an almost non-existing problem.. by over-empowering an >>>>> already out of control US government, with powers that we can't even begin >>>>> to understand the extend of how they could be abused... to "fix" an >>>>> industry >>>>> that has done amazingly good things for consumers in recent years. >>>>> >>>> You really should read 47CFR§8. It won't take you more than an hour or so, >>>> as it's only about 8 pages. >>>> >>>> The procedure for filing a complaint is pretty interesting, and requires >>>> the >>>> complainant to do some pretty involved things. (47CFR§8.14 for the >>>> complaint >>>> procedure, 47CFR§8.13 for the requirements for the pleading, etc). Note >>>> that the definitions found in 47CFR§8.11(a) and (b) are pretty specific in >>>> who is actually covered by 'net neutrality.' >>>>