On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 8:32 AM, John Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > With the "legal content" rule, I expect some bottom feeding bulk > mailers to sue claiming that their CAN SPAM compliant spam is legal, > therefore the providers can't block it. >
How would this legal environment be any different than the pre-Verizon network neutrality rules for network management of SPAM? -- *Collin David Anderson* averysmallbird.com | @cda | Washington, D.C.
