Rob Seastrom writes: > The wiki/living document approach others have suggested seems like a > poor one to me, for the same reason that I dislike the current trend > of "there's no release tarball, major release, point release, or > regression testing - just git clone the repository" in free software > development.
And I like wikis for some things, here it might work (I haven't looked) and I still do release tarballs with version numbers and some (we're actively adding more) regression/unit/functional testing. > Releng is hard and thankless :) > but adds enormous value and > serves as a forcing function for some level of review, cursory though > it may be. I think so too. Hey everybody, please support Network Time. Spread the word. OK, I said it. -- Harlan Stenn <st...@ntp.org> http://networktimefoundation.org - be a member!