customers are paying for good traffic to generate eye balls and revenue, not bad traffic which clouds the good work done. I know we are getting into filtering traffic wars here but if the source admins refuse to respond, refuse to cooperate, then if 100% of the traffic is bad then why not put up walls.
I would like country trade talks to get down to the technical point that there are some fundamental problems being seen with bad traffic usage and it is significant percentage of waste bandwidth. Colin > On 2 Apr 2015, at 08:42, Mark Tinka <mark.ti...@seacom.mu> wrote: > > > > On 2/Apr/15 09:35, Colin Johnston wrote: >> or ignore/block russia and north korea and china network blocks >> takes away 5% of network ranges for memory headroom, especially the large >> number of smaller china blocks. >> Some may say this is harsh but is the network contacts refuse to co-operate >> with abuse and 100% of the traffic is bad then why not > > I think that's a little extreme, especially since customers are paying > me to deliver packets to the whole Internet. > > But that's just me... > > Mark.
