You’ll be looking at a Juniper MX or a Cisco ASK9K I think. The MXs are targeted as being full-features edge routers. An MX5 will take a full feed just fine and do all the *VPN you want. If you’re talking about multiple full feeds then you’ll need a MX240 with one of the higher-power REs for a decent reconvergence time.
> On 9 Apr 2015, at 10:42 pm, Daniel Rohan <dro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 7:25 AM, Tim Raphael <raphael.timo...@gmail.com > <mailto:raphael.timo...@gmail.com>> wrote: > L3VPN hand off is the only thing I can think of from the top of my head. But > then, there would be no need to have a full table unless you had customers > requesting a full table. > > > I have one customer who needs an L3VPN for some shared private routes along > with a full table in inet.0. There are ways of accomplishing this creatively > but I'm looking for devices that can handle these types of requests that > permit us some level of sanity.
