In message <cal9jlaba5no6yq99crhdgrthtsb0vgp3gdneu-vu2-4r_1_...@mail.gmail.com> , Christopher Morrow writes: > On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Mel Beckman <[email protected]> wrote: > > I working on a large airport WiFi deployment right now. IPv6 is "allowed = > for in the future" but not configured in the short term. With less than 10,= > 000 ephemeral users, we don't expect users to demand IPv6 until most mobile= > devices and apps come ready to use IPv6 by default. > > > > 'we don't expect users to demand ipv6' > > aside from #nanog folks, who 'demands' ipv6? > > Don't they actually 'demand' "access to content on the internet" ? > > Since you seem to have a greenfield deployment, why NOT just put v6 in > place on day0? retrofitting it is surely going to cost time/materials > and probably upgrades to gear that could be avoided by doing it in the > initial installation, right?
+1 and you will most probably see about 50% of the traffic being IPv6 if you do so. There is lots of IPv6 capable equipment out there just waiting to see a RA. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [email protected]
