In message <20151001232613.gd123...@rootmail.cc.le.ac.uk>, Matthew Newton writes: > On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:42:57PM +0000, Todd Underwood wrote: > > it's just a new addressing protocol that happens to not work with the rest > > of the internet. it's unfortunate that we made that mistake, but i guess > > we're stuck with that now (i wish i could say something about lessons > > learned but i don't think any one of us has learned a lesson yet). > > Would be really interesting to know how you would propose > squeezing 128 bits of address data into a 32 bit field so that we > could all continue to use IPv4 with more addresses than it's has > available to save having to move to this new incompatible format. > > :-) > > Matthew
Additionally it is now a OLD addressing protocol. We are about to see young adults that have never lived in a world without IPv6. It may not have been universally available when they were born but it was available. There are definitely school leavers that have never lived in a world where IPv6 did not exist. My daughter will be one of them next year when she finishes year 12. IPv6 is 7 months older than she is. Some of us have been running IPv6 in production for over a decade now and developing products that support IPv6 even longer. We have had 17 years to build up a universal IPv6 network. It should have been done by now. Mark > -- > Matthew Newton, Ph.D. <m...@le.ac.uk> > > Systems Specialist, Infrastructure Services, > I.T. Services, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom > > For IT help contact helpdesk extn. 2253, <ith...@le.ac.uk> -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org