On 10/1/2015 5:16 PM, Ca By wrote:
I run a large 464xlat dominated mobile network. IPv4 bits are materially more expensive to deliver.
Isn't that simply a consequence of your engineering decision to use 464xlat instead of native dual-stack, as was originally envisioned for the transition?
And, as FB has shared, IPv6 is more performant for end users, and more performant is more profitable
Isn't that also at least partially a consequence of your engineering decision to use 464xlat?
Matthew Kaufman
