As mentioned before: even the new SUP2T from Cisco is limited to 1Mio routes ...
There are MANY other vendors with the same limitations: Juniper, Brocade, etc And the solt equipment is not the 99USD trash from the super market at the corner ... Jürgen Jaritsch Head of Network & Infrastructure ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH Telefon: +43-5-0556-300 Telefax: +43-5-0556-500 E-Mail: j...@anexia.at Web: http://www.anexia.at Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601 -----Original Message----- From: Max Tulyev [max...@netassist.ua] Received: Samstag, 03 Okt. 2015, 9:11 To: nanog@nanog.org [nanog@nanog.org] Subject: Re: AW: /27 the new /24 Which routers? DIR-300 with OpenWRT/Quagga? :) I think all above-the-trash level routers supports >1M routes, isn't it? On 02.10.15 17:45, Jürgen Jaritsch wrote: > Hi, > > this would at least help to get rid of many old routing engines around the > world :) ... or people would keep their "learn nothing smaller than /24" > filters in place. Also an option - but not for companies who act as an IP > transit provider. > > > best regards > > Jürgen Jaritsch > Head of Network & Infrastructure > > ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH > > Telefon: +43-5-0556-300 > Telefax: +43-5-0556-500 > > E-Mail: jjarit...@anexia-it.com > Web: http://www.anexia-it.com > > Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt > Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler > Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601 > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] Im Auftrag von Justin Wilson - > MTIN > Gesendet: Freitag, 02. Oktober 2015 16:32 > An: NANOG > Betreff: /27 the new /24 > > I was in a discussion the other day and several Tier2 providers were talking > about the idea of adjusting their BGP filters to accept prefixes smaller than > a /24. A few were saying they thought about going down to as small as a /27. > This was mainly due to more networks coming online and not having even a /24 > of IPv4 space. The first argument is against this is the potential bloat the > global routing table could have. Many folks have worked hard for years to > summarize and such. others were saying they would do a /26 or bigger. > > However, what do we do about the new networks which want to do BGP but only > can get small allocations from someone (either a RIR or one of their > upstreams)? > > Just throwing that out there. Seems like an interesting discussion. > > > Justin Wilson > j...@mtin.net > > --- > http://www.mtin.net Owner/CEO > xISP Solutions- Consulting – Data Centers - Bandwidth > > http://www.midwest-ix.com COO/Chairman > Internet Exchange - Peering - Distributed Fabric >
