Getting IPv6 to the masses without giving them the ability to get their IPv6 problems resolved seems not like a long-tail issue so much as a really poor choice of deployment plans.
Just my $0.02. Owen > On Oct 12, 2015, at 20:17 , Ca By <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Monday, October 12, 2015, Donn Lasher <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Having just returned from NANOG65/ARIN36, and hearing about how far IPv6 >> has come.. I find my experience with <large US-based ISP> support today >> Ironic. >> >> Oh wait.. >> >> Hi, my name is Donn, and I’m speaking for… myself. >> >> Irony is a cable provider, one of the largest, and earliest adopters of >> IPv6, having ZERO IPv6 support available via phone, chat, or email. And >> being pointed, by all of those contact methods, to a single website. A >> static website. In 2015, when IPv4 is officially exhausted. >> >> :sigh: >> >> >> > Tech support websites are long tail > > Pragmatists are focused on getting ipv6 to the masses by default in > high traffic use cases. > > Sighing about edge cases in the long tail with ipv6 ... Not sure what you > expect. > > <deleted comments about f5 not supporting standard ndp, which has caused me > outtages> > > CB
