Hi Matthew,
Thank a lot for your answer. This help me to understand, and make more
sense to me :-).
Thanks,
-Marcel
On 23.10.2015 18:31, Matthew Petach wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 1:41 AM, [email protected]
<[email protected]> wrote:
sorry for that, but the only one I've heard about switching his core IGP is
Yahoo. I've no precision, and it's really interest me.
I know that there had OSPF in the DC area, and ISIS in the core, and decide
to switch the core from ISIS to OSPF.
Wait, what?
*checks memory*
*checks routers*
Nope. Definitely went the other way; OSPF -> IS-IS in the core.
Why spend so much time/risk to switch from ISIS to OSPF, _in the core_ a not
so minor impact/task ?
So I could guess it's for maintain only one IGP and have standardized
config. But why OSPF against ISIS ? What could be the drivers? People skills
(more people know OSPF than ISIS) --> operational reason ?
I'm sorry you received the wrong information,
the migration was from OSPF to IS-IS, not
the other way around.
Thanks!
Matt
