DNS64 is a bad solution. It breaks DNSSEC. The proported benefits of DNS64 over other ways of providing IPv4 over IPv6 don't actually exist.
DS-Lite or one of the MAP encapsulation will actually be better in the long run. I say this as someone who has written a DNS64 implementation. Mark In message <cae_ug16_y+ww8b3vkh-v4rnggjygct9gh65z7uypf_-xur_...@mail.gmail.com> , Tim Durack writes: > For the record: > > Tim, > > I'm not on the NANOG lists and I don't see how I can respond to this thread: > > https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2014-August/069267.html > > but I figured I'd let you know that: > > https://developers.google.com/speed/public-dns/docs/dns64 > > is now available for testing. Perhaps it will be some use. > > Regards, > -Erik > > On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Tim Durack <tdur...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Anyone know of a reliable public DNS64 service? > > > > Would be cool if Google added a Public DNS64 service, then I could point > > the NAT64 prefix at appropriately placed boxes in my network. > > > > Why? Other people are better than me at running DNS resolvers :-) > > > > -- > > Tim:> > > > > > > -- > Tim:> -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org