On 8/Jun/16 14:56, Michael Hare wrote:
> I'm not against the theory of what is being proposed, but I was surprised to > see little discussion of this announcement on list. > > Upon examination on my view of the DFZ from AS3128 I see over 400 upstream > routes falling into this category, mostly in the 64512 - 65534 range. Based > on our flow bandwidth stats we chose to reach out to several origin ASN, two > fairly well known, as a courtesy. > > For the *TT's who are planning on implementing shortly, have you went through > a similar diagnostic effort and what might you share or report on such > endeavors? At the very least, "remove-private-as" should be a standard step in the procedure of turning up any eBGP session. Mark.
