In article <[email protected]> you write: >Canada's Anti-Spam Legislation has specific sections that makes altering >of data illegal under the Act. > >In my non-lawyer opinion, sections 10 (5) (b) and (e) would be violated >by hijacking someone preference to go to Website A and replace it with >Website B without their express consent to do so.
That section only applies to 10(4) which is about getting permission to install downloaded software. >Description of functions > >(5) A function referred to in subsection (4) is any of the following >functions ... I don't think the Quebec law is a good idea, or is likely to be effective, but I also don't think it has preemption issues. R's, John
