I participate on a few other mailing lists focused on eyeball networks. For a 
couple years I've been hearing complaints from this CDN or that CDN was 
behaving badly. It's been severely ramping up the past few months. There have 
been some wild allegations, but I would like to develop a bit more standardized 
evidence collection. Initially LimeLight was the only culprit, but recently it 
has been Microsoft as well. I'm not sure if there have been any others. 

The principal complaint is that upstream of whatever is doing the rate limiting 
for a given customer there is significantly more capacity being utilized than 
the customer has purchased. This could happen briefly as TCP adjusts to the 
capacity limitation, but in some situations this has persisted for days at a 
time. I'll list out a few situations as best as I can recall them. Some of 
these may even be merges of a couple situations. The point is to show the 
general issue and develop a better process for collecting what exactly is 
happening at the time and how to address it. 

One situation had approximately 45 megabit/s of capacity being used up by a 
customer that had a 1.5 megabit/s plan. All other traffic normally held itself 
within the 1.5 megabit/s, but this particular CDN sent excessively more for 
extended periods of time. 

An often occurrence has someone with a single digit megabit/s limitation 
consuming 2x - 3x more than their plan on the other side of the rate limiter. 

Last month on my own network I saw someone with 2x - 3x being consumed upstream 
and they had *190* connections downloading said data from Microsoft. 

The past week or two I've been hearing of people only having a single 
connection downloading at more than their plan rate. 

These situations effectively shut out all other Internet traffic to that 
customer or even portion of the network for low capacity NLOS areas. It's a DoS 
caused by downloads. What happened to the days of MS BITS and you didn't even 
notice the download happening? A lot of these guys think that the CDNs are just 
a pile of dicks looking to ruin everyone's day and I'm certain that there are 
at least a couple people at each CDN that aren't that way. ;-) 

Lots of rambling, sure. What do I need to have these guys collect as evidence 
of a problem and who should they send it to? 

Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 

Reply via email to