JDSU 5800 series .... very user friendly... nice reports... VNC remote connection so you can trigger test with out rolling a tech..
Robert Jacobs | Network Director/Architect Direct: 832-615-7742 Main: 832-615-8000 Fax: 713-510-1650 5959 Corporate Dr. Suite 3300; Houston, TX 77036 A Certified Woman-Owned Business 24x7x365 Customer Support: 832-615-8000 | [email protected] This electronic message contains information from Phonoscope Lightwave which may be privileged and confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify me by telephone or e-mail immediately. -----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brian Mengel Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 9:12 AM Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: 10G tester recommendations? We've used the Veex TX300 (now discontinued and replaced with the TX230S I believe) and been satisfied. Our primary use is RFC 2544 testing, so I don't know much about it's capabilities beyond that. On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Dustin Jurman <[email protected]> wrote: > We utilize the EXFO product line and it's a quality product. > > Dustin > > > Dustin Jurman > CEO > Rapid Systems Corporation > 1211 N. West Shore Blvd. Suite 711 > Tampa, FL 33607 > Ph: 813-232-4887 > Cell: 813-892-7006 > http://www.rapidsys.com > “Building Better Infrastructure” > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: NANOG [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bryan > Holloway > Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 3:09 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: 10G tester recommendations? > > We're in the market for a hand-held 10G ethernet tester, and I was > curious if the NANOG community had any recommendations or experiences > they would be willing to share, negative or positive. > > Currently we're looking at the EXFO MAX-800 and NetScout's AT 10G, but > we're open to other suggestions. > > Thank you! > > - bryan > >
