Sorbs is a pretty good list. And I've been on the listed-side too. I personally would not use it to block, but I would give it 3 of the 5 points.
The anti-spam gang is never going to be perfect. But since (self)regulation is not working, we need them. I value them at the moment. The only thing you can do about it, is figuring a way to solve this security issue (called spam). Met vriendelijke groet, David Hofstee Deliverability Management MailPlus B.V. Netherlands (ESP) ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- Van: "Tom Beecher" <beec...@beecher.cc> Aan: "Ken O'Driscoll" <k...@wemonitoremail.com>, nanog@nanog.org Verzonden: Zondag 18 december 2016 20:08:05 Onderwerp: Re: Not a representative of gmx.com but their emails are being blocked by those who subscribe to the SORBS RBL. I tend to scratch my head at anyone still using SORBS at this point. On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 8:27 AM Ken O'Driscoll <k...@wemonitoremail.com> wrote: > On Sat, 2016-12-17 at 20:15 -0800, Large Hadron Collider wrote: > > > Does anyone have information on why this is, and if you represent SORBS > > > and/or GMX and/or both, would you please trouble yourself with > > > contacting me off-list? > > > > You can find out why an IP was listed via their lookup facility: > > http://www. > > sorbs.net/lookup.shtml > > > > You can request de-listing by opening a support request: > > http://www.sorbs.net/cgi-bin/support > > > > You don't need to be an IP block owner to request de-listing but you do > need to be empowered to stop whatever caused the listing in the first > place. Their support is very responsive. > > > > Ken. > > > > -- > > Ken O'Driscoll / We Monitor Email > > t: +353 1 254 9400 | w: www.wemonitoremail.com > > > >