Hi Bob, This was inadvertent and we will bring this back for NANOG 70.
Regards, -Dave On Feb 6, 2017, 6:58 PM -0500, Bob Evans <[email protected]>, wrote: > I suggest in the future NOT to get rid of something because a new method > is attempted. I.E nanog had a nice method of identifying potential and > existing peers with a simple green dot at registration to indicate an > individual was involved with BGP in their company. That went away and > today there is nothing. Cost of implementation was less than 5 dollars at > any office supply retailer. > > Just a thought. > > Thank You > Bob Evans > CTO > > > > > > The Peering Personals has been shelved while we try to figure out a better > > option. > > > > There was no peering content submitted to the Program Committee that > > justified a separate track, and so they chose to include the content in > > the general session throughout the program. > > > > Regards, > > > > -Dave > > > > On Feb 6, 2017, 8:12 AM -0500, Matthew Petach <[email protected]>, > > wrote: > > > I'm squinting at the Guidebook for NANOG69, > > > and I don't seem to see any peering BOF or > > > peering social this time around. Am I being > > > blind again, and it's on the agenda somewhere > > > but I'm just overlooking it? > > > Pointers in the right direction would be appreciated. > > > > > > Thanks! :) > > > > > > Matt > > > >
