Hi Tyler, I have not yet tried this, but am doing so now, thanks!
-Dave On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Tyler Conrad <[email protected]> wrote: > Have you tried submitting a correction to some geolocation services > directly yet? Maxmind is pretty heavily used. > > https://support.maxmind.com/correction-faq/submit-a- > correction/how-do-i-submit-a-correction-to-geoip-data/ > > > On Thursday, February 9, 2017, David Sotnick <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi NANOG, >> >> You have given good advice on updating IP Geolocation data in the past, >> including visiting 'www.google.com' from a mobile device and selecting >> "use >> exact location [from GPS]". This worked out well for us a few years ago >> for >> a single IP which we were NATting out of in a new geographic location. >> >> Now we are in a position where we have been assigned site-local /24 (out >> of >> the corporation's larger /20 space) networks for a couple of locations and >> I'm wondering how I go about updating IP Geolocation data to note that two >> /24 networks are no longer at the Corporate HQ location. >> >> I understand that when users first start using these site-specific /24 >> networks, they will be lumped in with the larger /20 space as far as their >> geolocation goes, but besides the Google/GPS method, is there a >> cleaner/better way to do this? Do Geolocation services use SWIP data? >> Should I have the /24s have separate SWIP data noting the geo location? >> I'd >> love a place to be able to say: "This /24 is at this geoloc; this /24 is >> at >> this geoloc; and the corporate /20 remains where it always has been." >> >> Many thanks for your insights in this matter, >> >> -Dave >> >
