In message <[email protected]>, Stephane Bortzmeyer writes : > > Unfortunately, every time we've looked at the data, the > > conclusion has been that it would cause unwarranted user > > impact. IIRC the most recent blocker was a major US ISP whose > > clients would experience breakage if even just one NS record > > was dual-stacked. > > There are many zones (including your isc.org) that have several name > servers dual-stacked, and they didn't notice a problem. Furthermore, > since the DNS is a tree, resolution of google.com requires a proper > resolution of the root and .com, both having IPv6 name servers. > > So, this answer is at least insufficient.
It wouldn't suprise me if the dispute between Google and Cogent was not part of the issue. Pure speculation on my part. I could be completely off base. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [email protected]
