On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 11:40 AM,  <valdis.kletni...@vt.edu> wrote:
> Well, I'd be willing to buy that logic, except the specific buildings called
> out look pretty damned big for just drying off a cable.  For example, this
> is claimed to be the US landing point for TAT-14 - looks around 4K square 
> feet?

I think you might be off by an order of magnitude or two
on that.  4,000 sq ft is about the size of the guest bathroom
in Snowhorn's new house, isn't it?

(well, OK, maybe a slight exaggeration...  ;)


Reply via email to