There are several ISPs doing trials (thousands of users).

RFC6877 (464XLAT), section 4. Network Architecture, indicates clearly “Wireline 
Network Architecture can be used in situations where there
   are clients behind the CLAT, regardless of the type of access service
   -- for example, fiber to the home (FTTH), Data Over Cable Service
   Interface Specification (DOCSIS), or WiFi.”

Vendors confirmed two weeks ago they have implementations in CEs.

RFC7084 was created before all the new transition technologies (including 
464XLAT and MAP, for example, or even lw4o6 that has many advantages compared 
to DS-LITE, being the same but requiring a much simpler CGN), so that’s why I’m 
working to update it (most probably as an “accompanying document” only for the 
transition part:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc7084-bis
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-palet-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-transition

New versions to be publish this week hopefully …

Regards,
Jordi
 

-----Mensaje original-----
De: NANOG <[email protected]> en nombre de Mikael Abrahamsson 
<[email protected]>
Organización: People's Front Against WWW
Responder a: <[email protected]>
Fecha: sábado, 23 de septiembre de 2017, 13:22
Para: Fredrik Sallinen <[email protected]>
CC: <[email protected]>
Asunto: Re: IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp

    On Sat, 23 Sep 2017, Fredrik Sallinen wrote:
    
    > Please correct me If I'm wrong, AFAIK 464XLAT works best with mobile
    > networks and its not suitable for fixed broadband. right?
    
    It's most widely deployed in mobile networks, yes. There is nothing that 
    says it couldn't work anywhere else.
    
    However, in fixed networks with PPPoE the most commonly used model is dual 
    stack with RFC7084 style routers.
    
    -- 
    Mikael Abrahamsson    email: [email protected]
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or 
confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the 
individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, 
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if 
partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be 
considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware 
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this 
information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly 
prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the 
original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.



Reply via email to