Hi,

Cloudflare does deploy caches, however we usually look to do so in unique
locations, ie. where an ISPs network isn't already in reach of one of our
existing deployments/peering points.

You can email [email protected] directly if seeking this.

-Tom

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 7:22 AM, Marco Slater <[email protected]> wrote:

> Do they publicly have any more info on this?
>
> I thought CloudFlare didn’t consider doing that because of their vast
> coverage and peering arrangements provided by their PoPs.
>
> Regards,
> Marco Slater
>
> > On 29 Sep 2017, at 14:38, <[email protected]> <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I think that Cloudflare has a caching solution, but I think they have
> strict requirements towards the isp in order to install them on their
> premises.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Michalis Bersimis
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: NANOG [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Aaron Gould
> > Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 6:25 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: isp/cdn caching
> >
> > Hi, I've been aware of a few caching providers for a few years now, but
> I'm learning of others as time goes on. which makes me curious if there are
> more springing up and gaining popularity.  I'm speaking of ISP-type caching
> whereas the cache provider sends hardware servers and perhaps a switch to
> the local ISP to install locally in their network.  Can someone please send
> a simple list of what they know is the current players in this ISP Caching
> space?  I'll list the ones I know about and you please let me know of
> others.  This seems to be an evolving/growing thing and I'm curious of
> where we are today for significant providers and possibly up-and-coming
> ones that I should know about.  (amazon prime has my wondering also.)
> >
> >
> >
> > Google (GGC)
> >
> > Netflix (OCA)
> >
> > Akamai (AANP)
> >
> > Facebook (FNA)
> >
> > Apple (I heard this isn't isp-located like the others, but unsure)
> >
> > ? others ?
> >
> > ? others ?
> >
> > ? others ?
> >
> >
> >
> > -Aaron Gould
> >
>
>

Reply via email to