+1 for gross comment. On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Hunter Fuller <hf0002+na...@uah.edu> wrote:
> I think I'd rate this one as "gross but technically not breaking any rules > I suppose." (I couldn't find any at first glance, anyway.) > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 1:55 PM Ryan Hamel <ryan.ha...@quadranet.com> > wrote: > > > Greetings, > > > > A colleague of mine has static routed 172.16.0.0/32 to a usable IP > > address, to have a single known IP address be static routed to a regions > > closest server. While I understand the IP address does work (pings and > what > > not), I don't feel this should be the proper IP address used, but > something > > more feasible like a usable IP in a dedicated range (172.31.0.0/24 for > > example). > > > > I would to hear everyone's thoughts on this, as this the first IP address > > in an RFC1918 range. > > > > Thanks, > > > > -- > > Ryan Hamel > > ryan.ha...@quadranet.com | +1 (888) 578-2372 <(888)%20578-2372> > > QuadraNet, Inc. | Dedicated Servers, Colocation, Cloud > > > > -- > > -- > Hunter Fuller > Network Engineer > VBH Annex B-5 > +1 256 824 5331 > > Office of Information Technology > The University of Alabama in Huntsville > Systems and Infrastructure > -- Sincerely, Jason W Kuehl Cell 920-419-8983 jason.w.ku...@gmail.com
