> On Dec 28, 2017, at 09:23 , Octavio Alvarez <octalna...@alvarezp.org> wrote: > > On 12/20/2017 12:23 PM, Mike wrote: >> On 12/17/2017 08:31 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote: >> Call this the 'shavings', in IPv4 for example, when you assign a P2P >> link with a /30, you are using 2 and wasting 2 addresses. But in IPv6, >> due to ping-pong and just so many technical manuals and other advices, >> you are told to "just use a /64' for your point to points. > > Isn't it a /127 nowadays, per RFC 6547 and RFC 6164? I guess the > exception would be if a router does not support it. > > Best regards, > Octavio.
Best practice used most places is to assign a /64 and put a /127 on the interfaces. Owen