> On Mar 1, 2018, at 1:20 PM, Harald Koch <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 1 March 2018 at 15:18, Owen DeLong <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Second, RFC-1918 doesn’t apply to IPv6 at all, and (fortunately) hardly anyone > uses ULA (the IPv6 analogue to RFC-1918). > > Wait. What's the objection to ULA? Is it just that NAT is bad, or is there > something new?
No particular objection, but I don’t see the point. What can you do with ULA that GUA isn’t suitable for? Owen
