> On Mar 2, 2018, at 3:17 AM, Bjørn Mork <bj...@mork.no> wrote:
> Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> writes:
>> What can you do with ULA that GUA isn’t suitable for?
> 1) get
> 2) keep
> 3) move
Easy as going to http://tunnelbroker.net <http://tunnelbroker.net/> and
filling out a form. Remember to check the box for your /48.
Admittedly, you might have to connect to your tunnel every once in a
while to keep it alive, but that’s
hardly a high bar.
If you’re not talking to the internet with it (which you can’t with
ULA, theoretically), you can move that same
HE /48 anywhere you want, with the additional advantage that you can,
if you need to, connect your tunnel
and actually make it work on the internet too.
> Granted, many of us can do that with GUAs too. But with ULA those
> features are avaible to everyone everywhere. Which is useful for a
You really think that doing ULA according to the RFCs (collision avoidance
algorithm and all) is easier
than filling out a form at HE? REALLY?
> number of applications where you care mostly about the local environment
> and not so much about global connectivity.
I hear you, but I’m not convinced about the ease.