It’s just another lame buzzword. As if all prior networking designs were random! Sheesh!
The Montecarlo method is only used in statistics :) -mel > On May 29, 2018, at 12:16 PM, Michael Hallgren <[email protected]> wrote: > > BGP? :-) > > mh > > Le 2018-05-29 20:32, LF OD a écrit : >> Been following the articles on "intent-based" networking from Cisco >> and other vendors for a couple years now, and I have a basic grasp of >> the concept of "define your goals/outcomes and automation will make it >> so", but I do not know the practical applications of it or how you are >> supposed to convey your "intent". However, $dayjob is a medium-sized >> enterprise and looking at a potential refresh in the upcoming budget. >> So... do any of you at ISPs, Cloud Providers, or Enterprises have any >> hands-on experience with "intent-based" networking products? If so, >> could you please provide some info on what caused you to look at it, >> who did you look at, why did you choose whoever you chose, and is it >> working out for you? >> If you looked at it very closely and decided not to bother with it, >> I'd also be interested on your take. At $dayjob we have been adopting >> automation at the application and workload level, but there hasn't >> been much need for it at the infrastructure level. However, if we can >> improve the services we offer while refreshing that infrastructure, it >> wouldn't hurt - depending on cost of course. >> Thanks in advance. >> LF0D >
