On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:56 AM, Hank Nussbacher <h...@efes.iucc.ac.il> wrote:
> On 31/05/2018 21:44, John Peach wrote: > > On 05/31/2018 02:37 PM, Dan Hollis wrote: > >> On Thu, 31 May 2018, b...@theworld.com wrote: > >>> FWIW a German court has just ruled against ICANN's injunction and in > >>> favor of Tucows/EPAG. > >>> https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-4-2018-05-30-en > >> > >> Welcome to contact-free whois? > >> > >> -Dan > > > > > > Already been bitten by it and trying to get the contact info reinstated. > > > > > > > The entire whois debacle will only get resolved when some hackers attack > www.eugdpr.org, ec.europa.eu and some other key .eu sites. When the > response they get will be "sorry, we can't determine who is attacking > you since that contravenes GDPR", will the EU light bulb go on that > something in GDPR needs to be tweaked. > Usually, identifying attackers at other online services is a duty on RIR directories, and even the RIPE one is not suffering that many changes due to GDPR. Also, GDPR doesn't prevent law enforcement access. Rubens
