On 31/05/2018 08:14, Badiei, Farzaneh wrote: Gotta love the EU logic:
https://inews.co.uk/news/uk/gdpr-eu-commission-not-compliant/ The European Commission is not GDPR compliant even though it was responsible for the new GDPR law "The European Commission has insisted it is *not subject to the strict new data protection law* that it has imposed across Europe after it was revealed the personal information of hundreds of people had been leaked on its website. " -Hank > And here is the court decision, > https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/litigation-icann-v-epag-request-court-order-prelim-injunction-redacted-30may18-en.pdf > > > gotta love the German wisdom: > > > The Application for preliminary injunction of May 25, 2018 is rejected at the > expense of the Applicant. > > > "Insofar as the Applicant bases its claim to relief on a parallel of the > so-called "WHOIS" system to international agreements on trade mark registers, > the Chamber is unable to follow this. The legal basis for the trademark > registers on the basis of international agreements is missing in relation to > the "WHOIS" service claimed by the Applicant. The fundamental comparability > of the respective general need for protection does not change this." > >
