Better than excel at "Two People Editing Lane"

Mack

-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+c-mack.mcbride=charter....@nanog.org] On 
Behalf Of Alain Hebert
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 12:20 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: What are people using for IPAM these days?

     Google Docs =D

     (Just to be annoying).

-----
Alain Hebert                                aheb...@pubnix.net
PubNIX Inc.
50 boul. St-Charles
P.O. Box 26770     Beaconsfield, Quebec     H9W 6G7
Tel: 514-990-5911  http://www.pubnix.net    Fax: 514-990-9443

On 06/12/18 13:17, McBride, Mack wrote:
> Excel does not go down 'Will It Scale Road'.
> It ignores the stop light and crashes at 'Two People Editing Lane'.
>
> Mack
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stacy Hughes [mailto:ipgodd...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 9:43 AM
> To: McBride, Mack <c-mack.mcbr...@charter.com>
> Cc: sur...@mauigateway.com; nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: What are people using for IPAM these days?
>
> If you start with Excel, down Will It Scale Road, you will be sorry,  so very 
> sorry.  Especially when it comes to v6.
> Stacy
>
>> On Jun 12, 2018, at 8:13 AM, McBride, Mack <c-mack.mcbr...@charter.com> 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Allocations, not IPs.  And yes if they are reasonably static an excel 
>> spreadsheet can go higher.
>>
>> Mack
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: NANOG
>> [mailto:nanog-bounces+c-mack.mcbride=charter....@nanog.org] On Behalf 
>> Of Scott Weeks
>> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 2:40 PM
>> To: nanog@nanog.org
>> Subject: RE: What are people using for IPAM these days?
>>
>>
>>
>> --- c-mack.mcbr...@charter.com wrote:
>> From: "McBride, Mack" <c-mack.mcbr...@charter.com>
>>
>> If you are managing more than a thousand IPs allocations spreadsheets are 
>> not manageable for IPv4.
>> -----------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> I managed a /15, two /16s and several /24s (so, well over a quarter 
>> million IPs) on a spreadsheet for years.
>> So, that's an 'it depends' answer.
>>
>> scott
>> E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
>> The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are intended solely 
>> for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged 
>> information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or if 
>> this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert 
>> the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message and any attachments. 
>> If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, 
>> dissemination, distribution, copying, or storage of this message or any 
>> attachment is strictly prohibited.
> E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
> The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are intended solely 
> for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged 
> information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or if this 
> message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the 
> sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message and any attachments. If 
> you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, 
> dissemination, distribution, copying, or storage of this message or any 
> attachment is strictly prohibited.
>
>

E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: 
The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are intended solely for 
the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged 
information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or if this 
message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender 
by reply e-mail and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are 
not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination, 
distribution, copying, or storage of this message or any attachment is strictly 
prohibited.

Reply via email to