If additional capacity were something feasible, it would be done.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brad" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2018 1:53:52 PM Subject: Re: Impacts of Encryption Everywhere (any solution?) While I agree there are unintended consequences every time advancements are made in relation to the security and stability of the Internet- I disagree we should be rejecting their implementations. Instead, we should innovate further. Just because end to end encryption causes bandwidth issues for a very small number users - then perhaps they could benefit the most by these changes with additional capacity. -Brad -------- Original message --------From: Michael Hallgren <[email protected]> Date: 6/17/18 11:14 (GMT-07:00) To: [email protected] Cc: Matthew Petach <[email protected]>, [email protected] Subject: Re: Impacts of Encryption Everywhere (any solution?) Le 2018-06-17 12:40, [email protected] a écrit : > Well, yes, there is, you simply have to break the end to end encryption Yes, (or) deny service by Policy (remains to evaluate who's happy with that). Cheers, mh > > On 06/17/2018 03:09 AM, Matthew Petach wrote: >> Except that if websites are set to HTTPS only, there's no option for >> disabling encryption on the client side. >> >> Matt >> >> >> On Sat, Jun 16, 2018, 14:47 <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 06/16/2018 10:13 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: >>>> Sadly, it's just falling on deaf ears. Silicon Valley will continue >>>> to >>> think they know better than everyone else and people outside of that >>> bubble >>> will continue to be disadvantaged. >>> >>> What, again ? >>> Encryption is what is best for the most people. >>> The few that will not use it can disable it. >>> >>> No issue then. >>> >>> >>
