On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 3:55 AM, Saku Ytti <s...@ytti.fi> wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 at 05:55, Rob McEwen <r...@invaluement.com> wrote: >> Meanwhile, global warming >> alarmists have ALREADY made MANY dire predictions about oceans levels >> rising - that ALREADY didn't even come close to true. > > Now this discussion does not belong to NANOG, but 'global warming > alarmist' is worrying term to me. What is the perceived harm you're > trying to reduce?
Government regulation which results in increased costs. Climate science is interesting and worthy, but it's still too shaky and incomplete to justify trillion dollar decisions. For anyone who would have us Act Now Before It's Too Late, alarmist is the right term. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
