On 8/4/2018 01:04:17, "Eric Kuhnke" <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> wrote:
If you were setting up something new from a clean sheet of paper design
-
do you consider it appropriate to have an abuse role inbox that's
dedicated
to actual network abuse issues (security problems, DDoS, IP hijacks,
misbehavior of downstream customers, etc), and keep that separate from
DMCA
notifications?
Automated sorting tools *can* pull things which match regexes for
automatically-generated DMCA notifications out of an inbox and route
them
to the appropriate place.
However, I'm pondering whether it's better to have an ISP's ARIN IP
space
whois entries state clearly that copyright violation type notices
should go
to a dedicated-purpose dmca@ispname inbox.
The main issue with the notion of keeping abuse@ separate from a
dedicated DMCA takedown mailbox is companies like IP Echelon will just
blindly E-mail whatever abuse POC is associated with either the AS
record or whichever POCs are specifically associated with the NET block.
So it becomes kind of difficult to keep them routing to different
places.
The guys doing the DMCA takedowns use automated tooling. So asking
them nicely isn't going to help you.
