My understanding is that the calendar, which in this case showed a dozen or so 
copies, lists only crawled instances that had changed since The previous crawl. 
Well it certainly true that time elapses between each crawl, so it's possible 
that some changes could be missed, my understanding is that the Internet the 
scroll frequently enough that changes would be detected at least every month or 
so.

I think it's possible that the bogin list just doesn't change that frequently.

-mel via cell

> On Dec 15, 2018, at 1:30 AM, Lars Prehn <lpr...@inet.tu-berlin.de> wrote:
> 
> Hi Mel,
> 
> I already checked Archive.org - it holds two previous copies.
> 
> >> lets you download each version of the list that archive.org noticed changed
> 
> According to Archive.org's own Note this seems to be inaccurate:
> This calendar view maps the number of times 
> https://www.cidr-report.org/bogons/freespace-dec.txt was crawled by the 
> Wayback Machine, not how many times the site was actually updated.
> 
> , or am I missing something?
> 
> Best regards,
> Lars
> 
>> Am 15.12.18 um 09:47 schrieb Mel Beckman:
>> Lars,
>> 
>> Archive.org has snapshots going back several year. Just feed in the URL you 
>> posted, ad you’ll get a history that lets you download each version of the 
>> list that archive.org noticed changed. In my experience, that is pretty 
>> comprehensive.
>> 
>>  -mel beckman
>> 
>>> On Dec 15, 2018, at 12:31 AM, Lars Prehn <lpr...@inet.tu-berlin.de> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi everyone,
>>> 
>>> In order to sanitize historical BGP data I would like to use historical 
>>> Bogon lists. The CIDR report generates those lists on a daily basis (e.g. 
>>> https://www.cidr-report.org/bogons/freespace-dec.txt for prefixes) but, as 
>>> far as I know, it does not keep a history of those files - it only holds 
>>> the most up-to-date file. Does anybody know of a repository that contains 
>>> such bogon lists for historical data, or, did anybody continiously fecthed 
>>> and saved CIDR report's bogon lists?
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> 
>>> Lars
>>> 
> 

Reply via email to