On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 21:06, Grant Taylor via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> wrote:
> Do you have /24 cover prefixes advertised to the Internet? Yes, just it drops at the peering edge as more specific is not found. > $EMPLOYER requires globally routable access to the link net IP on our > equipment for specific configurations. Sorry, I can't go into details. > > I'm trying to ascertain if the configuration (as I understand it) that > advocating for would work for us or not. Would require details, but I believe the host/32 pointing to interface (no next-hop IP) ought to do the trick. -- ++ytti