In article <[email protected]> you write: >Yes. What is all the fuzz about? Email will be as dead as USENET in a >couple of years anyway.
Funny, people have been saying that pretty much every year since the 1990s. What's different this time?
- Re: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port ... Töma Gavrichenkov
- Re: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on ... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on ... Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan
- Re: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS... Cummings, Chris
- Re: yet another round of SMTP Over... Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan
- Re: yet another round of SMTP Over... Jason Hellenthal via NANOG
- Re: yet another round of SMTP ... Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan
- Re: yet another round of SMTP ... Jason Hellenthal via NANOG
- Enough port 26 talk... Richard
- Re: Enough port 26 talk... Bjørn Mork
- Re: Enough port 26 talk... John Levine
- Re: the e-mail of the future i... John R. Levine
- Re: the e-mail of the future i... Miles Fidelman
- Re: the e-mail of the future i... Bjørn Mork
- Re: the e-mail of the future i... Stephen Satchell
- Re: the e-mail of the future i... Tei
- Re: the e-mail of the future i... James Downs
- RE: the e-mail of the future i... Keith Medcalf
- Re: the e-mail of the future i... Grant Taylor via NANOG
- Re: yet another round of SMTP Over TLS... Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan
- Re: yet another round of SMTP Over... valdis . kletnieks
