It would be worth your time to look at Extreme SLX9640 with advanced routing license.
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 4:47 PM Roel Parijs <roel.par...@gmail.com> wrote: > We have been using the 7280SR-48C6 for 2.5 years now. Just after Arista > announced the full table BGP routing. > Looking at the price / port there is nothing near Arista. We also use > Cisco ASR1K and Juniper MX204 but these have far less capacity. > > When we first started, there were quite a few features missing but over > the past 2 year they have really been catching up. I was very happy when > they added MSS clamping at the end of last year. > > The new version 7280R2K should be able to handle 2M routes. > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 9:31 PM <na...@jack.fr.eu.org> wrote: > >> Check out the 7280sr2k, which is actually 24*10G, 24*25G, 6*100G >> >> On 03/05/2019 08:55 PM, David Hubbard wrote: >> > I love the NCS5501, but once Arista gets the 2M-route capacity down >> into the 48x10g format, I'd jump ship in a heartbeat; currently you have to >> do a much larger chassis-based device or their 100gig 7280 to have that >> route scale. My big gripes with the 5501 are that, due to its >> architecture, if you want to do uRPF, you chop your route scale in half, >> even on the 5501-SE. 5501 also has no supported configuration where you >> have both first hop redundancy and physical path redundancy, because you >> can't do both VRRP (its only redundant first hop option) and BVI's, can't >> do MC-LAG, can't do vPC, so you need switches in addition to the 5501's if >> that's the goal.. >> > >> > David >> > >> >>