Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote (on Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 12:12:41PM -0400): > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (on Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 10:26:43AM +0000): > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 03:41:35PM -0700, Jeff Shultz wrote: > > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > > > >Hi, I try adding google.com to my dns server to get more visitors > > > > >but google.com still show search engine. > > > > If you want a serious answer to your question, it's because your > > customers are not using your DNS servers to resolve queries (bully for > > them, I say). > > > > The next (evil) step that you would have to take would be to intercept > > outbound DNS queries (or maybe just the replies, even more evil) and > > replace the answers with the ones you want. There are lots reasons not > > to do this. > > > > The (slighty less evil, IMHO) other option would be for you to keep > > track of google.com's ips (not so easy, as you'll see once you try) and > > intercept web requests to those ips and replace them with your own. > > > This comes from an "Attorney and Counselor-at-Law", and without > a legal disclaimer? I'm shocked.
Most electronic disclaimers aren't worth the paper they're printed upon. :-) > I'm also shocked someone would actually advocate this. I'm > sure Google wouldn't be too happy to find out about it. I kinda hoped that anyone reading the above would NOT get the impression I'm advocating this. I'm not (unless you're a country with population exceeding one billion, in which case you write your own rules. :-) -- _________________________________________ Nachman Yaakov Ziskind, FSPA, LLM [EMAIL PROTECTED] Attorney and Counselor-at-Law http://ziskind.us Economic Group Pension Services http://egps.com Actuaries and Employee Benefit Consultants
