Randy, > with all due respect, jari; maybe the number of groups is neither the > problem nor the solution > > too much energy has been and is still being wasted dealing with overly > cute/complex ideas these wgs invent to fancy up ipv6 so it will be > deployed; from tla/nla/... to ula to sham6. this has prevented focusing > on the real problems of deployment so they can be solved. >
I know this very well. But I'm listening. We are already trying to do something about nat-pt. What else would you see as a priority? Jari
