At 12:42 PM -0400 10/2/07, William Herrin wrote: > >As far as I can tell, IPv6 is at least theoretically capable of >offering exactly two things that IPv4 does not offer and can't easily >be made to offer: > >1. More addresses. >2. Provider independent addresses > >At the customer level, #1 has been thoroughly mitigated by NAT, >eliminating demand. Indeed, the lack of IPv6 NAT creates a negative >demand: folks used to NAT don't want to give it up.
#1 has been partially mitigated by NAT, and perhaps only temporarily. The last chapter of that book is yet to be written. /John
