The nature of registry data leads to bugs like this, they should all be RIPENCC.
jas James Aldridge wrote: > > --On 8 October 2007 10:50:49 -0400 Jason Lewis > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> RIB IP Coverage for >> RIPENCC 312598027 13.9% >> RIB IP Coverage for >> RIPE 197332093 8.8% > > > Just out of interest, what's the difference between "RIPENCC" (the > Regional Registry?) and "RIPE" (a vaguely defined group of people who > contribute to the RIPE working group mailing lists and/or attend RIPE > meetings and/or have some interest in IP networking in and around > Europe and/or ... ?) here? > > James >
