On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:48:57 EDT, Leo Bicknell said: > In a message written on Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 11:19:57AM -0400, [EMAIL > PROTECTED] wrote: > > How much ship date slip for the IPv6 features you need are you willing to > > accept when 240/4 updates blow the schedule? > > Why would the 240/4 updates blow the schedule?
More code, more regression testing, same number of programmers. Do the math. Take it as a given that it *will* slip the schedule some amount, because the resources for a 240/4 feature will have to come from somewhere. So how much slippage are you willing to accept?
pgplUEMlgBoq7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
