> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 15:57:38 -0700 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], nanogui@linuxhacker.org > Subject: Re: [nanogui] Re: Is Nano-X dead? - Move to SVN+Trac? > > provided that there's some way to import from CVS, I don't imagine the > : choice of SCCS being terribly important, but I would hate to start from > : ground zero in my continual merge process. > > Do you mean import TO CVS? I know git for instance > allows importing from CVS projects, but I'm not sure about > its ability to export to CVS... something to consider for sure. > > : I'm having to do enough hand work as is. > > My last perusal of systems like git (and hopefully bazaar) > have mechanisms that allow for much smoother importation > of fixes and submissions. Linus swears by how much time > git saves him; there's also ways to import directly from an > email, for instance.
I've heard good things about git but haven't really understand it all. I've only used it to pull and update sources, everything else I still do by patches. I think it would be a good idea to move to a better system but I just never had the time to fully implement one. I would think git is a better candidate because of its wide usage but I would say move to one that would make contribution easier and less work. Jr. ____________________________________________________________ GET FREE 5GB EMAIL - Check out spam free email with many cool features! Visit http://www.inbox.com/email to find out more! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
