We are using FLTK 2.0.0 with nano-X 0.91. These are the versions that came bundled with our embedded OS distribution (uClinux).
As for the visual results, I have only good things to report. Anti-aliased true type fonts with Freetype 2.3.5 look amazing. FLTK 2 allows for theming and provides lots of widgtes to choose from. FLTK is also very well documented and (I find it) very stable. As for memory requirements, our nano-X configuration uses about 2MB without any application running, and about 11 MB when our application is running on its full. Maybe it's a little heavy, but the looks are worth it. ;-) We also use nanowm (the window manager) which takes up 260kB. Anyway, I am sure you can make everything fit into a more constrained system, if you have to. As for the overall speed, our 32-bit Nios II processor runs at 100 MHz and everything feels very fast and responsive, unless: - you need to draw large amounts of text on the screen - you use some big (size 48 and above) truetype fonts - you need to switch between windows very often Overall, I am very pleased with the nano-X + FLTK 2 combination. Good luck, Ricardo. 2009/5/14 Siji Sunny <siji.su...@net4uonline.com> > Hello All, > I recently start using Microwindows and now want to do lot of application > development on top of it specially for embedded devices. > > For getting more user friendly GUI's am thinking to use either FTLK or GTK. > > So can anybody suggest me which is more compatible with Microwindow. > > Thanks in Advance > > -- > Siji Sunny > Sr.Software Engineer > > Net4Uonline Pvt. Ltd. > http://www.net4uonline.com/ > Tel : +91 22 40108555 > Fax: +91 22 22186274 > -- ---------------------------------------------- Ricardo Pereira Jasinski jasin...@solvis.com.br Tel: (41) 9955-2852 LME - Laboratório de Microeletrônica da UTFPR UTFPR Microelectronics Lab www.lme.cpdtt.cefetpr.br Tel: +55 41 3310 4756
